Sunday, June 28, 2009

Book Analysis

Analysis:

What I gleamed from the book as it relates to Adult Education is the need to ensure that Women’s voice is taken into consideration when creating theories or development models.

There is no argument that men and women are psychologically different. The argument here is not if one gender is better, smarter, or right however, it is critical that both voices are heard. It is critical that both viewpoints are examined and considered.

For those who have completed EDAE 624 – Adult Teaching and Learning, you will recall that we discussed in depth Psychological development and the stages of Adult Development. We even explored Erikson’s Psychosocial Development model in particular. This is the same model that Gilligan challenges in her book. According to Gilligan, Erikson’s model was created based on interpretation of the male child. She does not argue that the stages are not applicable to the male child she merely contends that the female interpretation results in the stages are a bit different and since women make up around 50% of the audience, it would behoove us not to include this population in the research. Therefore, life cycle theories should include experiences of both males and females to be all inclusive.

What does this have to do with Adult Education? In an effort to mentor Adult Learners and guide them through their transformational journeys in education, Adult Educators must be aware of their audiences, their social roles and the timing of life events that affect their audience’s development. When we utilize theorist’s models, we need to know that they are all encompassing; that they look at all of human experiences and not just one sided.

Gilligan worked with Erikson and Kohlberg at Harvard. They taught psychology in the traditions of Freud and Piaget. Through research, listening, studies and interviews, Gilligan found that the basic conflict that men face in the adolescence stage of Erikson’s model, Identity vs. Role Confustion, was actually faced by women in the young adulthood stage and that during a women’s adolescence stage the basic conflict was that of Intimacy vs. Isolation which men experience in their young adulthood stage. This is extremely important to recognize as Adult educators as the Young Adulthood stage spans from 19 – 40 years.

To be successful as Adult Educators, our focus on course development, audience expectations and needs, and transformational learning, must take into consideration our learner’s motivations, social roles, and assumptions, all of which are driven by their psychological development which differs between men and women.

6 comments:

  1. Hey Christine, I'm still a "young adult." I love this theory!

    It's hard to comment on this not having read the book but I think it's hard to argue with the basic premise.

    A question for me would be what would be a way, practice, method etc. that should be changed to be more inclusive? Preferably something I could put to use right away.

    --Patrick

    C'mon by my blog...All genders welcome!
    http://edae692.blogspot.com/

    ReplyDelete
  2. It really is amazing how much things have changed over the last 30 years. I do believe that there is a lot more awareness and consideration for Women's point of views in today's society however, a lot of the theorists and their theories were comprised prior to this awareness. When the author refers to voice, she isn't saying that society is listening to women she is referring more to women's expereinces and taking them into consideration.

    I think as Adult Educators, the first thing we need to ensure is that we are considering the different experiences that men and women bring into the classroom. Being aware of those experiences help others learn as well as help us mentor and transform individual learning experiences.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This has made me remember something I saw on television about how they are separating boys and girls in the classroom because they recognize their different learning styles and behaviors in the classroom. While I think it's great that these differences are being recognized, I also think at some point we're going to have to figure out how to make it work with everybody together. I guess that's what we have been doing all this time. Any thoughts?

    ReplyDelete
  4. I think it is wonderful that learning styles are being recognized and considered in the classroom. I believe there are activities/tasks that may warrant division by learning styles however, for the overall classroom I don't think it should be separated by gender. Each gender and learning style has so much to bring to the classroom. All voices should be heard and those experiences when shared are incredibly valuable to all learners. Sometimes learning occurs in this format that may not otherwise be gained from the instructor alone. What are everyone else's thoughts?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hi Christine,

    Is the point that we need to update our theories, or retest and rethink them them to make them more inclusive?

    In the classroom your talking about bringing in the different experiences of men and women into the classroom. I wonder if it's that simple.

    In a group of twenty men I'm sure we'd all have vastly different experiences of the world. I'd gather it's the same for females. I could be being a knucklehead here, but when we're talking about women's experience I have to wonder *which women* we're taking about.

    I'm not trying to be difficult. Really I'm just looking for some practical advice for making my classroom more inclusive and useful to everyone.

    --Patrick

    C'mon by my blog...bring your experience!
    http://edae692.blogspot.com/

    ReplyDelete
  6. What I took from the book is that the theories are good and applicable to Adult Learning today but we must be mindful that when a lot of the research and testing on the theories were done, it was male based. Therefore, we need to be congnizant of the fact that womens viewpoints and voices were not considered in the findings.

    I agree that you a room full of one gender would still bring in different experiences regardless of gender. We do want to make sure that all relevant experiences are encouraged and shared. But, if you are preparing for a class and are using Erikson's model you want to be aware that women are not necessarily going to be at the stage of development he refers to and that is all right. There is anything wrong with being a different stages but as facilitators we can't bucket them into a group and assume something is wrong with them because they don't "fit" the model.

    ReplyDelete